95-Am-243

 95-Am-243 MINSK,JAERIEVAL-JAN02 V.M. Maslov+, T.Nakagawa         
INDC(BLR)-006+        DIST-MAR02 REV2-FEB02            20020202   
----JENDL-3.3         MATERIAL 9549                               
-----INCIDENT NEUTRON DATA                                        
------ENDF-6 FORMAT                                               
                                                                  
HISTORY                                                           
77-03 New evaluation was made by S.Igarasi and T.Nakagawa/Ig77/   
82-03 Complete reevaluation for JENDL-2 was made by               
      Y.Kikuchi/Ki82/                                             
88-03 Reevaluation for JENDL-3 was made by T.Nakagawa /Na89/      
00-03 JENDL-3.3 was compiled by T.Nakagawa                        
      Evaluated data of Maslov et al. /Ma96/ were extensively     
      adopted.                                                    
02-01 Resonance parameters and Nu-d were modified.                
                                                                  
     ***** Modified parts from JENDL-3.2 *******************      
     All data                                                     
     *******************************************************      
                                                                  
================================================================= 
Description on modified parts from Maslov's evaluation.           
================================================================= 
                                                                  
MF=1 General information                                          
  MT=452  Total number of neutrons per fission                    
       Sum of MT=455 and 456.                                     
  MT=455  Delayed neutrons                                        
       Nu-d were based on the data of Charlton et al./Ch97/,      
       Saleh et al. /Sa97/ and Brady and England /Br89/.          
       Decay constants were taken from Saleh et al. and Brady and 
       England.                                                   
                                                                  
MF=2 Resonance Rapameters                                         
  MT=151                                                          
    Resolved resonance parameters (up to 250 eV)                  
       Background cross section was given to fission so as to     
       reproduce the thermal cross section of 0.0813 +- 0.025 b   
       measured by Kobayashi et al. /Ko99/                        
       Fission width of levels around 10 - 50 eV was modified so  
       as to reproduce the measured fission cross secion /Ko99/.  
                                                                  
    Unresolved resonance parameters (250 eV - 42.3751 keV)        
       The level spacing was modified to keep consistency with    
       that of L=0 and J=2.0. The neutron width was also modified 
       with the same factor as the level spacing. Interpolation   
       of cross sections was changed to 5 (log-log).              
       The fission width was maltiplied by a factor of 0.8 to 1.0 
       to agree with the recent experimental data /Ko99/.         
                                                                  
    Calculated Thermal cross sections and Resonance integral      
                                                                  
                 at 0.0253 eV (b)   Res. Integ. (b)               
       Total          84.25           -                           
       Elastic         7.464          -                           
       Fission         0.0813            7.54                     
       Capture        76.71           1790                        
                                                                  
MF=3 Neutron Cross Sections                                       
  MT=2   elastic                                                  
    Calculated as Total - partial cross sections.                 
                                                                  
  MT=18   Fission                                                 
    Above 500 keV, JENDL-3.2 was adopted because JENDL-3.2 was in 
    better agreement with experimental data than Maslov's         
    evaluation.  Between 42.375 keV to 500 keV, the cross section 
    was determined by eye-guiding.                                
                                                                  
    NOTE: The data of MT's=19, 20 and 21 calculated by Maslov et  
    al. /Ma96/ were not adopted.                                  
                                                                  
  MT=102 Capture                                                  
    Direct and semi-direct capture cross section was calculated   
    with DSD code /Ka99/, and added to Maslov's calculation.      
                                                                  
MF=5 Energy Distributions of Secondary Neutrons                   
  MT=16, 17, 91                                                   
    At the threshold energies, the same shape of distributions at 
    the second incident energy was assumed.  Interpolation was    
    replaced with 22.                                             
  MT=455                                                          
    Results of summation calculation made by Brady and England    
    /Br89/ were adopted. Abundances obtained by Saleh et al./Sa97/
    were adopted.                                                 
                                                                  
 Other parts are the same as Maslov's evaluation.                 
                                                                  
                                                                  
References                                                        
Br89) Brady M.C. and England T.R.:  Nucl. Sci. Eng., 103, 129     
    (1989).                                                       
Ch97) Charlton W., et al. 1997 Trieste, Part I, p.491 (1997)      
Ig77) Igarasi S. and Nakagawa T.: JAERI-M 7174 (1977).            
Ka99) Kawano T.: private communication (1999).                    
Ki82) Kikuchi Y.: JAERI-M 82-096 (1982).                          
Ko99) Kobayashi K. et al.: J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 36, 20 (1999). 
Ma96) Maslov V.M. et al.: INDC(BLR)-006 (1996).                   
Na89) Nakagawa T.: JAERI-M 89-008 (1990).                         
Sa97) Saleh H.H., et al.: Nucl. Sci. Eng., 125, 51 (1997).        
                                                                  
                                                                  
========== Description given in Maslov's data =================== 
                                                                  
 95-Am-243 MINSK BYEL  EVAL-JUL96                                 
                      DIST-SEPTEMBER96                            
                      V.M. MASLOV, E.Sh. SUKHOVITSKIJ,            
                      Yu.V. PORODZINSKIJ, A.B. KLEPATSKIJ,        
                      G.B.  MOROGOVSKIJ                           
 STATUS                                                           
 EVALUATION WAS MADE UNDER THE PROJECT AGREEMENT CIS-03-95        
 WITH INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER (MOSCOW).       
 FINANCING PARTY OF THE CENTER FOR THE PROJECT IS JAPAN.          
 EVALUATION WAS REQUESTED BY Y.KIKUCHI (JAERI, TOKAI)             
 DOCUMENTED IN INDC(BLR)-006, 1996.                               
                                                                  
 MF=1   GENERAL  INFORMATION                                      
                                                                  
   MT=451  COMMENTS AND DICTIONARY                                
   MT=452  TOTAL NUMBER OF NEUTRONS PER FISSION                   
           SUM OF MT=455 AND MT=456.                              
   MT=455  DELAYED NEUTRON DATA                                   
           NUMBER OF DELAYED NEUTRONS AND                         
           DECAY CONSTANTS FROM BRADY ET AL./1 /                  
   MT=456  NUMBER OF PROMPT NEUTRONS PER FISSION                  
           MADLAND-NIX MODEL CALCULATIONS /2/ FITTED TO           
           THE MEASURED DATA OF KHOKHLOV ET AL. /3/ AND           
           FREHAUT ET AL. /4/. ABOVE  EMISSIVE FISSION            
           THRESHOLD A SUPERPOSITION OF NEUTRON EMISSION          
           IN (N,XNF) REACTIONS /5/ AND PROMPT FISSION            
           NEUTRONS IS EMPLOYED.                                  
                                                                  
 MF=2   RESONANCE PARAMETERS                                      
                                                                  
   MT=151  RESONANCE  PARAMETERS  (MLBW)                          
           RESOLVED RESONANCE REGION :     1.0E-5 - 250 EV        
           PARAMETERS FOR BREIT -WIGNER FORMULA ARE BASED UPON    
           THE TOTAL CROSS SECTION MEASUREMENTS OF BERRETH ET AL. 
           /6/ AND SIMPSON ET AL./7/, FISSION CROSS SECTION       
           MEASUREMENTS OF KNITTER ET AL./8/ AND SEEGER/9/.       
           THE LATTER BEING NORMALIZED TO GIVE =0.228mEV      
                                                                  
           THERMAL TOTAL BASED ON BERRETH ET AL./6/.              
           THERMAL FISSION BASED ON DATA OF HULET ET AL./10/,     
           BELANOVA ET AL./11/, ASGHAR AT AL./12/ AND WAGEMANS    
           ET AL./13/.                                            
           THERMAL CAPTURE BASED ON BUTLER ET AL./14/,            
           BAK ET AL./15/ AND FOLGER ET AL./16/.                  
                                                                  
           CALCULATED THERMAL CROSS SECTIONS AND RESONANCE        
           INTEGRALS ARE:                                         
                            2200 M/SEC       RES.INTEG.           
              TOTAL         84.2330 b            -                
              ELASTIC        7.4642 b            -                
              FISSION        0.0638 b            7.436            
              CAPTURE       76.7050 b         1788.150            
           UNRESOLVED RESONANCE REGION : 0.25 - 42.3751 KEV.      
           ENERGY INDEPENDENT PARAMETERS:                         
              R=9.11891 FM  FROM OPTICAL MODEL CALCULATIONS       
              S1=2.176*10-4  FROM OPTICAL MODEL CALCULATIONS      
              S2=1.059*10-4  FROM OPTICAL MODEL CALCULATIONS      
           ENERGY   DEPENDENT PARAMETERS:                         
           S0 -DECREASES FROM .873-4 (0.15KEV) TO .834-4 (42.4KEV)
           D - SPIN DEPENDENT, NORMALIZED TO  =0.566 EV     
           WITH ACCOUNT OF LEVEL MISSING /17/                     
           WF -SPIN DEPENDENT AS DEFINED BY THE TRANSITION STATE  
           SPECTRA AT INNER AND OUTER BARRIER HUMPS, NORMALIZED   
           TO =0.228 mEV TO FIT UNRESOLVED RESONANCE REGION
           EXPERIMENTAL FISSION DATA /8,18/.                      
           WG - FROM CASCADE MODEL WITH ACCOUNT OF FISSION AND    
           NEUTRON EMISSION COMPETITION, SPIN DEPENDENT. NORMA-   
           LIZED TO = 0.043 EV.( FITTS  /18,19/).          
                                                                  
 MF=3   NEUTRON CROSS SECTIONS                                    
                                                                  
   MT=1,4,51-60,91,102.  TOTAL, ELASTIC AND INELASTIC             
           SCATTERING, CAPTURE CROSS SECTION                      
           TOTAL,DIRECT ELASTIC AND DIRECT INELASTIC FOR MT=51,   
           53,56 AND OPTICAL TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS FROM       
           COUPLED CHANNELS CALCULATIONS.                         
           THE DEFORMED OPTICAL POTENTIAL USED:                   
           VR=(46.04-0.3*E) MEV    RR=1.26 FM  AR=0.615 FM        
           WD=(3.50+0.4*E)  MEV  E <  10 MEV    RD=1.24 FM        
           WD= 7.50 MEV          E=>  10 MEV    AD=0.5 FM         
           VSO=6.2 MEV RSO=1.12 FM ASO=0.47 FM  B2=0.180 B4=0.086 
           FOUR LOWER LEVELS OF GROUND STATE ROTATIONAL BAND      
           ARE COUPLED.                                           
           CAPTURE,COMPOUND ELASTIC AND INELASTIC BY STATISTICAL  
           MODEL, SEE MT=18-21                                    
           ABOVE NEUTRON ENERGY 5 MEV CAPTURE IS ASSUMED TO BE    
           0.001  BARN AS PREDICTED BY DIRECT AND SEMI-DIRECT     
           CAPTURE CALCULATIONS                                   
           ADOPTED LEVEL SCHEME OF AM-243 FROM NUCLEAR DATA       
           SHEETS /20/                                            
                                                                  
             No       ENERGY(MEV)     SPIN-PARITY   K             
            g.s.       0.0             5/2   -     5/2            
             1         0.0422          7/2   -     5/2            
             2         0.084           5/2   +     5/2            
             3         0.0964          9/2   -     5/2            
             4         0.1092          7/2   +     5/2            
             5         0.1435          9/2   +     5/2            
             6         0.1623         11/2   -     5/2            
             7         0.1893         11/2   +     5/2            
             8         0.238          13/2   -     5/2            
             9         0.244          13/2   +     5/2            
            10         0.266           3/2   -     5/2            
                                                                  
                                                                  
          OVERLAPPING LEVELS ARE ASSUMED ABOVE 0.267 MEV          
          LEVEL DENSITY PARAMETERS: SEE MT 18-21                  
   MT=16,17.  (N,2N) AND (N,3N) CROSS SECTION                     
          FROM STATISTICAL MODEL CALCULATIONS /21/ WITH THE       
          ACCOUNT OF PRE-EQUILIBRIUM NEUTRON EMISSION:SEE MT=18-21
   MT=18,19,20,21.  FISSION CROSS SECTION IS CALCULATED WITHIN    
          STATISTICAL MODEL /22,23/, THE MEASURED DATA OF:        
          WISSHAK ET AL./18/, KNITTER ET AL. /8/,                 
          FURSOV ET AL./24/ ARE FITTED.                           
          THE FIRST CHANCE FISSION MT=19 IS CALCULATED WITH       
          THE CONTRIBUTION OF EMISSIVE FISSION TO TOTAL FISSION   
          CROSS SECTION ACCORDING TO /22,25/.                     
                                                                  
 MF=4   ANGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS OF SECONDARY NEUTRONS               
                                                                  
        FOR MT=2,51,53,56 FROM COUPLED CHANNELS CALCULATIONS      
        WITH ADDED ISOTROPIC STATISTICAL CONTRIBUTION.            
                                                                  
        MT=16,17,18-21,52,54,55,57-60,91 -  ISOTROPIC             
                                                                  
 MF=5   ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS OF SECONDARY NEUTRONS                
                                                                  
        ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR MT=16,17 WERE                    
        CALCULATED BY STATISTICAL MODEL OF CASCADE NEUTRON        
        EMISSION TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE HISTORY OF THE DECAY     
        WITH THE ALLOWANCE OF PRE-EQUILLIBRIUM EMISSION OF        
        THE FIRST NEUTRON /5/                                     
        ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR MT=18,19,20,21 WERE CALCULATED   
        BY MADLAND-NIX MODEL /2/ WITH ACCOUNT OF COMPETITION      
        BETWEEN MULTIPLE-CHANCE FISSION PROCESSES UP THROUGH      
        THIRD-CHANCE FISSION WITH THE ALLOWANCE OF PRE-EQUILIBRIUM
        EMISSION OF THE FIRST NEUTRON /5,21/                      
                                                                  
REFERENCES                                                        
                                                                  
 1. Brady M.C., Wright R.Q., England T.R., Report                 
    ORNL/CSD/TM-226(1991), IAEA-NDS-102, 1992.                    
 2. Madland D.G., Nix J.R., Nucl. Sci. Engng. 81, 213 (1982).     
 3. Khokhlov Yu.A. et al., Nuclear Data for Science and           
    Technology, Proc. of the Int. Conf., Gatlinburg, Tennessee,   
    USA, May 9-13, 1994, v.I, p. 272.                             
 4. Frehaut J., Bertin A., Bois R., CEA-N-2396, 1984, p.69        
 5. Maslov V.M., Porodzinskij Yu.V.,Sukhovitskij E.Sh., Proc.     
    Int. Conf. on Neutron Physics, 14-18 Sept., Kiev, USSR,       
    V.1, p.413, 1988.                                             
 6. Berreth J.R., Simpson F.B., Report IN-1407, 1970, p.66.       
 7. Simpson O.D., Simpson F.B., Harvey J.A. et al., Nucl. Sci.    
    Eng., 55, 273 (1974).                                         
 8. Knitter H.-H., Budtz-Jorgensen C. Nucl.Sci.Eng., 99, 1 (1988) 
 9. Seeger P.A., Report LA-4420, 1970, p.138                      
    6, 561 (1979)                                                 
10. Hulet E.K., Hoff R.W., Bowman H.R., Mochel M.C. Phys. Rev.    
    107, 1294 (1957)                                              
11. Belanova T.S. et al., Preprint SIIAR, P-156, 1972.            
12. Asghar M., Caitucoli F., Perrin P. et al. Ann. Nucl. Energy,  
    6, 561 (1979)                                                 
13. Wagemans C., Schillebeeckx P., Bocquet J.P., Private communic.
14. Butler J.P., Lounsbury M., Merrit J.S. Can. Journ. of Phys.,  
    35, 147 (1957)                                                
15. Bak M.M., Krivokhatskiy, Petrzhak K.A. et al. Atomnaya        
    Energiya, 23, 316 (1967)                                      
16. Folger R.L., Smith J.A., L.C. Browne et al. Nuclear Cross     
    Sections and Technology, Proc. Conf., Washington DC, March    
    4-7, 1968, v.2, p.1279, NBS Special Publication 299 (1968)    
17. Porodzinskij Yu.V., Sukhovitskij E.Sh., Nuclear Constants,    
    4, p.27, 1987 (in Russian)                                    
18. Wisshak K., Kappeler Nucl. Sci. Eng. 85, 251 (1983)           
19. Weston L.W. and Todd J.H. Nucl. Sci. Eng., 91, 444 (1985)     
20. ENSDF, 1995.                                                  
21. Ignatjuk A.V., Maslov V.M., Pashchenko A.B. Sov. J. Nucl.     
    Phys. 47, 224 (1988).                                         
22. Ignatjuk A.V., Maslov V.M., Proc. Int. Symp. Nuclear Data     
    Evaluation Methodology, Brookhaven, USA, October 12-16, 1992, 
    p.440, World Scientific, 1993.                                
23. Maslov V.M. Sov. J. At. Energy 64, 478 (1988).                
24. Fursov B.I., Baranov E.Yu., Klemyshev M.P. et al. Sov. J.     
    At. Energy 59, 899 (1985)                                     
25. Maslov V.M., Kikuchi Y. JAERI-Research 96-030, 1996.