48-Cd-113 JAEA EVAL-FEB22 S.Kunieda, A.Ichihara, K.Shibata+ DIST-DEC21 20100316 ----JENDL-5 MATERIAL 4846 -----INCIDENT NEUTRON DATA ------ENDF-6 FORMAT History 09-11 Re-evaluation was performed for JENDL-4.0 10-03 Compiled by S.Kunieda 21-11 revised by O.Iwamoto (MF8/MT4,16,17,22,24,28,32,41,102-104,107) JENDL/AD-2017 adopted (MF8/MT105,106) added (MF10/MT4,17,22,32,103) JENDL/AD-2017 based MF= 1 General information MT=451 Descriptive data and directory MF= 2 Resonance parameters MT=151 Resolved and unresolved resonance parameters - Resolved resonance region (MLBW formula): below 1 keV The resonance parameters were taken from the work of Frankle et al./1/ As for unknown radiation widths, values of 100 meV and 160 meV were assumed for s- and p-wave resonances, respectively. Part of total spin J were based on the work of Corvi et al./2/ The values of unknown J were estimated by a random number method. The parameters for 0.178 eV were changed by considering the latest measurements of Kopecky et al./3/ - Unresolved resonance region: 1.8 keV - 200 keV The parameters were obtained by fitting to the total and capture cross sections calculated by the POD code /4/. The ASREP code /5/ was employed in this evaluation. The unresolved parameters should be used only for self-shielding calculation. Thermal cross sections & resonance integrals at 300 K ---------------------------------------------------------- 0.0253 eV res. integ. (*) (barns) (barns) ---------------------------------------------------------- Total 2.01942E+04 Elastic 2.52554E+01 n,gamma 2.01690E+04 3.88087E+02 ---------------------------------------------------------- (*) Integrated from 0.5 eV to 10 MeV. MF= 3 Neutron cross sections MT= 1 Total cross section Sum of partial cross sections. MT= 2 Elastic scattering cross section The OPTMAN /6/ & POD /4/ calculations. MT= 3 Non-elastic cross section Sum of partial non-elastic cross sections. MT= 4,51-91 (n,n') cross section The OPTMAN /6/ & POD /4/ calculations. MT= 16 (n,2n) cross section MT= 17 (n,3n) cross section MT= 22 (n,na) cross section MT= 28 (n,np) cross section MT= 32 (n,nd) cross section Calculated by the POD code /4/. MT=102 Capture cross section Calculated by the POD code /4/. The value of gamma-ray strength function was determined to reproduce experimental capture cross sections measured by Wisshak et al /7/. MT=103 (n,p) cross section MT=104 (n,d) cross section MT=105 (n,t) cross section MT=106 (n,He3) cross section MT=107 (n,a) cross section Calculated by the POD code /4/. MT=203 (n,xp) cross section Sum of (n,np) and (n,p) MT=204 (n,xd) cross section Sum of (n,nd) and (n,d) MT=205 (n,xt) cross section MT=206 (n,xHe3) cross section Calculated by the POD code /4/. MT=207 (n,xa) cross section Sum of (n,na) and (n,a) MF= 4 Angular distributions of emitted neutrons MT= 2 Elastic scattering The OPTMAN /6/ & POD /4/ calculations. MF= 6 Energy-angle distributions of emitted particles MT= 16 (n,2n) reaction MT= 17 (n,3n) reaction MT= 22 (n,na) reaction MT= 28 (n,np) reaction MT= 32 (n,nd) reaction Neutron spectra calculated by the POD code /4/. MT= 51-90 (n,n') reaction Neutron angular distributions calculated by OPTMAN /6/ & POD /4/. MT= 91 (n,n') reaction Neutron spectra calculated by the POD code /4/. MT= 203 (n,xp) reaction MT= 204 (n,xd) reaction MT= 205 (n,xt) reaction MT= 206 (n,xHe3) reaction MT= 207 (n,xa) reaction Light-ion spectra calculated by the POD code /6/. MF=12 Gamma-ray multiplicities MT= 3 Non-elastic gamma emission Calculated by the POD code /4/. MF=14 Gamma-ray angular distributions MT= 3 Non-elastic gamma emission Assumed to be isotropic. MF=15 Gamma-ray spectra MT= 3 Non-elastic gamma emission Calculated by the POD code /4/. *************************************************************** * Nuclear Model Calculations with POD Code /4/ * *************************************************************** 1. Theoretical models The POD code is based on the spherical optical model, the distorted-wave Born approximaiton (DWBA), one-component exciton preequilibrium model, and the Hauser-Feshbach-Moldauer statis- tical model. With the preequilibrium model, semi-empirical pickup and knockout process can be taken into account for composite-particle emission. The gamma-ray emission from the compound nucleus can be calculated within the framework of the exciton model. The code is capable of reading in particle transmission coefficients calculated by separate spherical or coupled-channel optical model code. In this evaluation, the OPTMAN code /6/ was employed for neutrons, while the ECIS code /8/ was adopted for charged particles. 2. Optical model & parameters Neutrons: Model: The coupled-channel method based on the rigid-rotor model was adopted. OMP : Coupled-channel optical potential /9/ was applied. The original parameters were slightly modified to give precise reaction cross sections. The optical potential parameters used in evaluation are listed as follows. ------------------------------------------------------------ - Real-volume term VR0= -3.80E+1 MeV VR1= 2.70E-2 MeV VR2= 1.20E-4 MeV VR3= 3.50E-7 MeV VRLA= 9.49E+1 MeV ALAVR= 4.32E-3 r= 1.21E+0 a= 6.70E-1 - Imaginary-surface term WDBW= 1.30E+1 MeV WDWID= 1.30E+1 MeV ALAWD= 1.40E-2 r= 1.21E+0 a= 6.50E-1 - Imaginary-volume term WCBW= 1.70E+1 MeV WCWID= 1.01E+2 MeV r= 1.21E+0 a= 6.50E-1 - Spin-orbit term VS= 6.26E+0 MeV ALASO= 5.00E-3 WSBW= -3.10E+0 MeV WSWID= 1.60E+2 MeV r= 1.05E+0 a= 5.90E-1 - Isospin coefficients CISO= 2.43E+1 WCISO= 1.80E+1 CCOUL= 9.00E-1 - Deformation parameter Beta2= -1.50E-1 ------------------------------------------------------------ Protons: Model: Spherical OMP : Koning and Delaroche /10/ Deuterons: Model: Spherical OMP : Bojowald et al. /11/ Tritons: Mode: Spherical OMP : Becchetti and Greenlees /12/ He-3: Model: Spherical OMP : Becchetti and Greenlees /12/ Alphas: Model: Spherical OMP : A simplified folding model potential /13/ (The nucleon OMP was taken from Ref./9/.) 3. Level scheme of Cd-113 ------------------------------------ No. Ex(MeV) J PI CC ------------------------------------ 0 0.00000 1/2 + * 1 0.26359 11/2 - 2 0.29849 3/2 + * 3 0.31618 5/2 + 4 0.45839 7/2 + 5 0.52233 7/2 - 6 0.53000 9/2 + 7 0.58414 5/2 + 8 0.63806 9/2 - 9 0.68057 3/2 + 10 0.70842 5/2 + 11 0.76000 1/2 + 12 0.81640 7/2 + 13 0.85530 5/2 - 14 0.87850 5/2 - 15 0.88360 1/2 + 16 0.89740 3/2 + 17 0.93970 5/2 + 18 0.96000 3/2 - 19 0.98844 1/2 + 20 1.00720 5/2 + 21 1.03370 5/2 - 22 1.03730 3/2 - 23 1.04750 7/2 + 24 1.04990 3/2 + 25 1.12609 1/2 + 26 1.17000 3/2 + 27 1.17680 3/2 + 28 1.19465 3/2 - 29 1.19540 9/2 + 30 1.21430 11/2 - 31 1.26810 3/2 + 32 1.27980 3/2 + 33 1.32220 0 + 34 1.35160 0 + ------------------------------------ Levels above 1.36160 MeV are assumed to be continuous. 4. Level density parameters Energy-dependent parameters of Mengoni-Nakajima /14/ were used ---------------------------------------------------------- Nuclei a* Pair Esh T E0 Ematch Elv_max 1/MeV MeV MeV MeV MeV MeV MeV ---------------------------------------------------------- Cd-114 14.703 2.248 2.747 0.629 0.285 7.448 2.465 Cd-113 14.918 1.129 2.940 0.622 -0.905 6.375 1.352 Cd-112 14.435 2.268 2.419 0.735 -0.781 9.301 2.649 Cd-111 14.779 1.139 2.384 0.681 -1.366 7.239 1.341 Ag-113 13.626 1.129 3.744 0.689 -1.414 7.329 0.271 Ag-112 14.064 0.000 3.764 0.653 -2.318 5.738 0.018 Ag-111 13.420 1.139 3.581 0.725 -1.706 7.873 1.277 Pd-111 14.697 1.139 4.157 0.644 -1.471 7.172 0.603 Pd-110 13.913 2.288 3.640 0.645 0.154 7.754 2.140 Pd-109 14.484 1.149 3.832 0.727 -2.390 8.692 0.327 ---------------------------------------------------------- 5. Gamma-ray strength functions M1, E2: Standard Lorentzian (SLO) E1 : Generalized Lorentzian (GLO) /15/ 6. Preequilibrium process Preequilibrium is on for n, p, d, t, He-3, and alpha. Preequilibrium capture is on. References 1) Frankle, C.M., et al.: Phys. Rev., C50, 2774 (1994); Phys. Rev., C45, 2143 (1992). 2) Corvi, F., et al.: 94 Gatlinburg, p.201 (1994). 3) Kopecky, S., et al.: Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B267 2345 (2009). 4) A.Ichihara et al., JAEA-Data/Code 2007-012 (2007). 5) Y.Kikuchi et al., JAERI-Data/Code 99-025 (1999) [in Japanese]. 6) E.Soukhovitski et al., JAERI-Data/Code 2005-002 (2005). 7) Wisshak et al., Phys. Rev. C66, 025801 (2002). 8) J.Raynal, CEA Saclay report, CEA-N-2772 (1994). 9) S.Kunieda et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 44, 838 (2007). 10) A.J.Koning, J.P.Delaroche, Nucl. Phys. A713, 231 (2003). 11) Bojowald et al., Phys. Rev. C 38, 1153 (1988). 12) F.D.Becchetti,Jr., G.W.Greenlees, "Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions," p.682, The University of Wisconsin Press (1971). 13) D.G.Madland, NEANDC-245 (1988), p. 103. 14) A.Mengoni, Y.Nakajima, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 31, 151 (1994). 15) M.Brink, Ph.D thesis, Oxford University, 1955.